Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Fero

State v. Fero, 103 N.J.L. 715 (N.J. 1927)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1927-03-24
Topic: general

*716 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11. For reversal — -None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Fero. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*716 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -None.