Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Marques v. Lewis Mir

103 N.J.L. 498

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1927-01-31
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11. For reversal — Kone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marques v. Lewis Mir. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.