Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Bullock
103 N.J.L. 204
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1926-10-18
- Topic
- general
Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, JJ. 7. For reversal — White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 5.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Bullock. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, JJ. 7.
For reversal — White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 5.