Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Westphal v. Guarino

Westphal v. Guarino, 78 N.J. 308 (N.J. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1978-10-31
Topic
estate-planning

78 N.J. 308 (1978) 394 A.2d 354 ELIZABETH WESTPHAL, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM WESTPHAL, DECEASED, AND ELIZABETH WESTPHAL, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LAWRENCE A. GUARINO, DEFENDANT, AND MURRAY WAGMAN, DOMINICK A. SCIALABBA AND STUART J. FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Westphal v. Guarino. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
78 N.J. 308 (1978) 394 A.2d 354

ELIZABETH WESTPHAL, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM WESTPHAL, DECEASED, AND ELIZABETH WESTPHAL, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
LAWRENCE A. GUARINO, DEFENDANT, AND MURRAY WAGMAN, DOMINICK A. SCIALABBA AND STUART J. FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 16, 1978. Decided October 31, 1978.

Mr. Robert P. McDonough argued the cause for appellants Scialabba and Friedman (Messrs. McDonough, Murray and Korn, attorneys).

Mr. John Zen Jackson argued the cause for appellant Wagman (Messrs. Shanley and Fisher, attorneys).

*309 Mr. Franklin M. Sachs argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Podvey and Sachs, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 163 N.J. Super. 139.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.