Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Wiedenmayer v. Villanueva
55 N.J. 81
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1969-12-15
- Topic
- estate-planning
55 N.J. 81 (1969) 259 A.2d 465 GUSTAVE E. WIEDENMAYER, ET AL., ETC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES E. VILLANUEVA, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR BRUCE ALEXANDER JOHNSON AND JENNIE ANNE JOSEPHINE JOHNSON, MINORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, JOHN SEWARD JOHNSON, III, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wiedenmayer v. Villanueva. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
GUSTAVE E. WIEDENMAYER, ET AL., ETC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CHARLES E. VILLANUEVA, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR BRUCE ALEXANDER JOHNSON AND JENNIE ANNE JOSEPHINE JOHNSON, MINORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, JOHN SEWARD JOHNSON, III, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 1, 1969. Decided December 15, 1969.Mr. Charles E. Villanueva argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Van Riper, Belmont, & Villanueva, attorneys; Messrs. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, of the New York bar, of counsel).
Mr. James C. Pitney argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys).
Mr. Alfred C. Clapp argued the cause as Guardian ad litem for John Seward Johnson, III and Clelia Constance Johnson (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Bitar argued the cause for R. Carter Nicholas, Guardian ad Litem for Certain Minors (Messrs. Jeffers & Dillon, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 106 N.J. Super. 161.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal None.