Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer
In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer, 54 N.J. 523 (N.J. 1969)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1969-10-14
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. Ho costs in any Court. For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7. For reversal — Hone.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. Ho costs in any Court.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — Hone.