Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

OMILANOWICZ v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 20 N.J. 308 (1956)

HENRY OMILANOWICZ, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT., 20 N.J. 308 (N.J. 1956)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1956-01-23
Topic: general

OMILANOWICZ v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 20 N.J. 308 (1956) HENRY OMILANOWICZ, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 23, 1956. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed OMILANOWICZ v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 20 N.J. 308 (1956). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

OMILANOWICZ v. UNITED ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,20 N.J. 308(1956)

HENRY OMILANOWICZ, PETITIONER-PETITIONER, v. UNITED ENGINEERS

CONSTRUCTORS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

January 23, 1956.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Charles BresslerandMr. Aaron Gordonfor the petitioner.Mr. David M. Sellickfor the respondent.

Denied.Page 309