Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Radziwil
121 N.J. 527
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1990-12-11
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- It is “appropriate — if not incumbent — upon the trial judge to instruct the jury regarding the use” of habit testimony
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Radziwil. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
PER CURIAM
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 235 N.J.Super. 557, 563 A.2d 856 (1989).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — none.