Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

DEPEW v. C.W. DEPEW CO., 98 N.J. Eq. 461 (1925)

CALVIN M. DEPEW, complainant, v. C.W. DEPEW Co. et al., defendants., 98 N.J. Eq. 461 (Court of Chancery. 1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1925-11-27
Topic
general

DEPEW v. C.W. DEPEW CO., 98 N.J. Eq. 461 (1925) CALVIN M. DEPEW, complainant, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DEPEW v. C.W. DEPEW CO., 98 N.J. Eq. 461 (1925). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DEPEWv.C.W. DEPEW CO.,98 N.J. Eq. 461(1925)
CALVIN M. DEPEW, complainant,v.C.W. DEPEW COMPANY et al., defendants.
Court of Chancery.
Decided November 27th, 1925.
An unfiled conditional bill of sale made by a corporation is enforceable against its receiver if there be no creditor of the corporation having a lien upon the goods "by attachment or levy."
On motion to direct receiver to return goods sold on conditional bill of sale.
Mr. Richard M. Glassner, for the motion.Messrs. Grossman Kwalick, for the receiver.
BACKES, V.C.
The receiver has in his possession two Mack trucks sold to the defendant company by the Mack International Motor Truck Company under a conditional bill of sale. The first of the eighteen monthly installments was paid. Those due since are in default. The receiver declines to pay and refuses to surrender the truck because a copy of the conditionalPage 462bill of sale, filed in due form and in the proper public office, did not bear the signature of the president of the defendant company, as did the original. His claim is that it is not a true copy. It is assumed, not decided, that the copy is defective. No creditor of the defunct company had a lien by "attachment or levy" upon the trucks when the receiver was appointed.

The conditional sale was good against the company without the filing of a copy of the contract. It is void, if not filed, only as against purchasers without notice and creditors who acquire liens "by attachment or levy."2 Comp. Stat. p. 3130.The receiver stands in the shoes of the company. As the company could not attack the contract, he cannot.Koernerv.U.S. Waxed Co.,94 N.J. Eq. 655; Falaenauv.Reliance Steel Foundry Co.,74 N.J. Eq. 325; Smithv.Hotel Ritz Co.,74 N.J. Eq. 616.

The receiver will be ordered to hand over the property.