Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co., 7 Stock. 265 (N.J. 1920)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1920-10-21
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisoh, .Black, Katzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—14. For reversal.—None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisoh, .Black, Katzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—14. For reversal.—None.