Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Lambert v. Vare

4 Stock. 211

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1918-05-03
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Learning. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner— 13. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lambert v. Vare. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner— 13.

For reversal — None.