Opinion · New Jersey Court of Chancery
Smith v. Smith
Smith v. Smith, 55 N.J. Eq. 821 (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1896)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Court of Chancery
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1896-11-15
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor. For affirmance — Lippincott, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Hendrickson, Nixon — 6. For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Dayton — 5.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Smith v. Smith. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.
For affirmance — Lippincott, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Hendrickson, Nixon — 6.
For reversal — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Dayton — 5.