Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Blanchard v. Town of Kearny
Blanchard v. Town of Kearny, 153 N.J. Super. 158 (New Jersey Superior Court 1977)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1977-10-19
- Topic
- litigation
153 N.J. Super. 158 (1977) 379 A.2d 288 LARRY BLANCHARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF KEARNY AND JAMES HESLEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWN OF KEARNY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN BARNOWSKI, SR., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Blanchard v. Town of Kearny. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
LARRY BLANCHARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TOWN OF KEARNY AND JAMES HESLEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWN OF KEARNY, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN BARNOWSKI, SR., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 3, 1977. Decided October 19, 1977.Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.
Mr. Robert A. Rusignola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rusignola & Pugliese, attorneys).
Mr. Charles A. Rooney, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Rooney, Peduto & Rooney, attorneys; Mr. Gustave A. Peduto, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the trial judge's reported opinion. 145 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1976).