Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Poydan, Inc. v. Agia Kiriaki, Inc.
139 N.J. Super. 365
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1976-03-01
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The judgment of the Chancery Division, 130 N. J. Super. 141 is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge-Eulop. Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Poydan, Inc. v. Agia Kiriaki, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
POYDAN, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, SPRINGFIELD STEAK HOUSE, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND FRANK BALDAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
AGIA KIRIAKI, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AAA IMPORTERS LIMITED, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, NICHOLAS PROTOPAPAS, CONSTANTINE ZAVOLAS, NIKITAS PROTOPAPAS, JOHN ZAVOLAS AND JOHN PROTOPAPAS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 17, 1976. Decided March 1, 1976.Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and ARD.
Mr. Sanford Silverman argued the cause for appellant Agia Kiriaki, Inc. (Messrs. Surgent & Surgent, attorneys).
Mr. Robert A. Rusignola argued the cause for appellants Protopapas (Messrs. Rusignola & Pugliese, attorneys).
Mr. Louis M. Minotti argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Minotti and Mr. Donald W. Rinaldo, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Chancery Division, 130 N.J. Super. 141 is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Fulop.
Affirmed.