Opinion · New Jersey Court of Chancery
Morris & Essex Railroad v. Haskins
26 N.J. Eq. 295
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Court of Chancery
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1875-05-15
- Topic
- general
The Chancellor. Home of the questions presented by the bill, and on the decision of which the complainants’ claim to relief depends, are new questions of a very important character, and eminently proper to be decided by a court of law. They will probably come up for adjudication before the Court of Errors, at its next term, in proceedings pending in that court between these parties. I deem it proper to await the action of that court in the premises. The present motion will, therefore, be denied, but without costs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Morris & Essex Railroad v. Haskins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Home of the questions presented by the bill, and on the decision of which the complainants’ claim to relief depends, are new questions of a very important character, and eminently proper to be decided by a court of law. They will probably come up for adjudication before the Court of Errors, at its next term, in proceedings pending in that court between these parties. I deem it proper to await the action of that court in the premises. The present motion will, therefore, be denied, but without costs.