Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Breitman v. Jaehnel

Breitman v. Jaehnel, 15 Stock. 559 (N.J. 1927)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1927-01-31
Topic
general

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, KAYS, JJ. 7. For reversal — KATZENBACH, LLOYD, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, JJ. 4. *Page 560

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Breitman v. Jaehnel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, KAYS, JJ. 7.

For reversal — KATZENBACH, LLOYD, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, JJ. 4. *Page 560