Opinion · Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Parsons v. Jameson
70 N.H. 625
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Hampshire
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire
- Date
- 1899-12-05
- Topic
- general
Wallace, J. The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. Pitman v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parsons v. Jameson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The plaintiff’s motion to add interest to the verdict should not have been granted. If he desired an instruction for the allowance of interest, he should have asked for it before the jury retired. By his failure to do so, he waived his right to it and all objections for the want of it, in the same manner he would his right to any other instruction. Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N. H. 230.
Exception sustained.
Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.