Opinion · Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Bell v. Lamprey

Bell v. Lamprey, 58 N.H. 124 (N.H. 1877)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire
Date
1877-08-05
Topic
general

Stanley, J. This case is governed by Bell v. Woodward, 47 N. H. 539, S. C., 48 N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bell v. Lamprey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
BELL v. LAMPREY,58 N.H. 124(1877)
BELL v. LAMPREY.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Rockingham.
Decided August, 1877.
A question of law, once decided at the law term, will not be reconsidered in the same case except on a motion made at the law term for a rehearing; and such a motion will not ordinarily be entertained when a trial has been had since the decision.
ASSUMPSIT. On the question of discharge in insolvency, the judge, at the trial term, ruled according to the previous decision in this case, reported in57 N.H. 168, and the defendant excepted. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion of the defendant for a new trial.
Small and Wiggin, for the defendant.

Hatch and C. U. Bell, for the plaintiff.
STANLEY, J.
This case is governed by Bell v. Woodward,47 N.H. 539, S.C.,48 N.H. 437,443, and Stantons v. Thompson,49 N.H. 272,275. Questions of law, once decided, will not ordinarily be reheard after a trial.

Judgment on the verdict.

DOE, C. J., did not sit.Page 125