Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATARAZZO v. DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY, 302 N.Y. 552 (1951)

AIEXANDER MATARAZZO, Respondent, v. DAILY GAZETTE Co., Appellant., 96 N.E.2d 442 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1951-01-01
Topic: general

MATARAZZO v. DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY, 302 N.Y. 552 (1951) 96 N.E.2d 442 AIEXANDER MATARAZZO, Respondent, v. DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 13, 1950 Decided January 4, 1951 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, RYAN, J. William W. Wemple for appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATARAZZO v. DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY, 302 N.Y. 552 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATARAZZOv.DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY,302 N.Y. 552(1951)

96 N.E.2d 442

AIEXANDER MATARAZZO, Respondent,v.DAILY GAZETTE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 13, 1950

Decided January 4, 1951

Page 553

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, RYAN, J.Page 554

William W. Wemplefor appellant.Harry G. Coplonfor respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. Questions certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.