Opinion · Illaw Illinois

CITY OF CHICAGO v. HOLMES, 339 Ill. App. 146 (1949)

City of Chi., Appellee, v. F.H. Holmes, Appellant., 88 N.E.2d 744 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)

Type: Opinion
Court: Illaw Illinois
Jurisdiction: Illaw
Date: 1949-12-02
Topic: general

CITY OF CHICAGO v. HOLMES, 339 Ill. App. 146 (1949) 88 N.E.2d 744 City of Chicago, Appellee, v. F.H. Holmes, Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CITY OF CHICAGO v. HOLMES, 339 Ill. App. 146 (1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CITY OF CHICAGO v. HOLMES,339 Ill. App. 146(1949)

88 N.E.2d 744

City of Chicago, Appellee, v. F.H. Holmes, Appellant.

Gen. No. 44,751. (Abstract of Decision.)

Appellate Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed November 21, 1949

Released for publication December 2, 1949

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. JAY A. SCHILLER, Judge, presiding. Reversed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the April term, 1949.

Litsinger, Gatenberg Spuller, for appellant;

John D. Clancy, Jr., of counsel;

Benjamin S. Adamowski, Corporation Counsel, for appellee;

L. Louis Karton, Head of Appeals and Review Division, and Harry H. Pollack, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE TUOHY.

Not to be published in full.Opinion filed November 21, 1949; released for publication December 2, 1949.