Opinion · Nylaw New York

FRIEDMAN v. ROSENTHAL, 297 N.Y. 862 (1948)

IRVING FRIEDMAN, Individually & as Coadministrator of the Est. of ARONSTORCH, Deceased, Appellant, v. LENA ROSENTHAL, Respondent, et al.,Defendants., 79 N.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1948)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1948-03-11
Topic
general

FRIEDMAN v. ROSENTHAL, 297 N.Y. 862 (1948) 79 N.E.2d 270 IRVING FRIEDMAN, Individually and as Coadministrator of the Estate of ARONSTORCH, Deceased, Appellant, v. LENA ROSENTHAL, Respondent, et al.,Defendants.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted March 1, 1948 Decided March 11, 1948 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, STEINBRINK, J. Henry Gerson and Alexander Slater for motion. Nathan Davis, David Kallman and Philip Davis opposed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FRIEDMAN v. ROSENTHAL, 297 N.Y. 862 (1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FRIEDMANv.ROSENTHAL,297 N.Y. 862(1948)
79 N.E.2d 270
IRVING FRIEDMAN, Individually and as Coadministrator of the Estate of ARON
STORCH, Deceased, Appellant,v.LENA ROSENTHAL, Respondent, et al.,
Defendants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted March 1, 1948
Decided March 11, 1948
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, STEINBRINK, J.
Henry GersonandAlexander Slaterfor motion.Nathan Davis, David KallmanandPhilip Davisopposed.
Motion dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, unless within fifteen days, all papers required by rule 21 (subd. [b]) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals are filed.Page 863