Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Ali

96 N.Y.2d 840

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
2001-06-07
Topic
bankruptcy

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum. Because defendant failed to timely move to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3), his claim that his guilty plea should be vacated has not been preserved as a question of law for review. The Appellate Division erroneously concluded that a question of law was preserved. Accordingly, the case must be remitted to the Appellate Division to allow that court to exercise its broader review power.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Ali. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

Because defendant failed to timely move to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3), his claim that his guilty plea should be vacated has not been preserved as a question of law for review. The Appellate Division erroneously concluded that a question of law was preserved. Accordingly, the case must be remitted to the Appellate Division to allow that court to exercise its broader review power.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.