Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

STATE v. WILKINS, 85 Ohio St.3d 1213 (1999)

STATE OF Ohio, APPELLANT, v. WILKINS, APPELLEE., 709 N.E.2d 169 (Ohio 1999)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1999-05-12
Topic
general

STATE v. WILKINS, 85 Ohio St.3d 1213 (1999) 709 N.E.2d 169 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILKINS, APPELLEE. No. 98-895.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted March 30, 1999 — Decided May 12, 1999. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 16586.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. WILKINS, 85 Ohio St.3d 1213 (1999). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. WILKINS,85 Ohio St.3d 1213(1999)
709 N.E.2d 169
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILKINS, APPELLEE.
No. 98-895.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Submitted March 30, 1999 —
Decided May 12, 1999.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 16586.
Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney,Cheryl A. Ross and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant ProsecutingAttorneys, for appellant.Greger Ovington, Lawrence J. Greger and Sharon L. Ovington, for appellee.
The appeal is dismissed,sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.