Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
MOTION DOCKET, 81 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1998)
MOTION DOCKET, 81 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1998), 690 N.E.2d 1284 (Ohio 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1998-01-01
- Topic
- general
MOTION DOCKET, 81 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1998) 690 N.E.2d 1284Supreme Court of Ohio. 1998. MOTION DOCKET Monday, March 9, 199897-2419. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v.Sheward. In Mandamus and Prohibition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 81 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MOTION DOCKET,81 Ohio St.3d 1463(1998)
690 N.E.2d 1284
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1998.
Monday, March 9, 1998
97-2419. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v.Sheward.
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of prohibition and mandamus. Upon consideration of relators' request for oral argument; relators' motion for certification of respondent class and maintenance as respondent class action; motion for admissionpro hac viceof attorney Robert S. Peck by Don C. Iler, Esq.; motion for leave to intervene by Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery; and motion of respondent, Norman A. Fuerst, to substitute proper party,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for oral argument be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for certification of respondent class and maintenance as respondent class action be, and hereby is, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for admissionpro hac viceof attorney Robert S. Peck be, and hereby is, granted.Page 1464
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene by Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion of respondent Hon. Norman A. Fuerst to substitute proper party be, and hereby is, granted, and Hon. Nancy A. Fuerst is substituted for Hon. Norman A. Fuerst.