Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Hambel v. Regan

78 N.Y.2d 1092

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1991-11-21
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (174 AD2d 891). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hambel v. Regan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (174 AD2d 891).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.