Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF CASE v. PANZARELLA, 292 N.Y. 575 (1944)

In the Matter of JOHN CASE et al., Doing Bus. under the Name of CASE SMITH LUMBER Co., Judgment Creditors, Respondents, against PAUL V.PANZARELLA, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.ANDERSON BRICK & SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellant., 54 N.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1944)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1944-03-02
Topic: general

MATTER OF CASE v. PANZARELLA, 292 N.Y. 575 (1944) 54 N.E.2d 691 In the Matter of JOHN CASE et al., Doing Business under the Name of CASE SMITH LUMBER COMPANY, Judgment Creditors, Respondents, against PAUL V.PANZARELLA, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.ANDERSON BRICK AND SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted February 21, 1944 Decided March 2, 1944 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, ADLERMAN, J. Morris Wagman for motion. Joseph Kramer opposed. Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements on the ground that no leave may be granted by this court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF CASE v. PANZARELLA, 292 N.Y. 575 (1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF CASE v. PANZARELLA,292 N.Y. 575(1944)

54 N.E.2d 691

In the Matter of JOHN CASE et al., Doing Business under the Name of CASE

SMITH LUMBER COMPANY, Judgment Creditors, Respondents, against PAUL V.

PANZARELLA, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

ANDERSON BRICK AND SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted February 21, 1944

Decided March 2, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, ADLERMAN, J.Page 576

Morris Wagmanfor motion.Joseph Krameropposed.

Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements on the ground that no leave may be granted by this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 589, subd. 1.)