Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Rotunno v. City of Rochester
71 N.Y.2d 995
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1988-05-26
- Topic
- general
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice Michael F. Dillon at the Appellate Division (120 AD2d 160). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rotunno v. City of Rochester. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 35 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice Michael F. Dillon at the Appellate Division (120 AD2d 160).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.