Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER, 36 Ohio St.3d 605 (1988)
522 N.E.2d 459
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 1988-02-17
- Topic
- general
IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER, 36 Ohio St.3d 605 (1988) 522 N.E.2d 459 IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER: STUDER ET AL. v. HEETER. No. 88-AP-030Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 17, 1988. Judges — Affidavit of disqualification — Vague and unsubstantiated allegations insufficient — Affidavit filed solely to obtain a delay could result in appropriate sanctions.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER, 36 Ohio St.3d 605 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER,36 Ohio St.3d 605(1988)
522 N.E.2d 459
IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BASINGER: STUDER ET AL. v. HEETER.
No. 88-AP-030
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided February 17, 1988.
These vague allegations are wholly without merit and are insufficient on their face for a finding of bias or prejudice.
Furthermore, this affidavit, like other affidavits of disqualification filed by this affiant, appears to have been filed solely to obtain a delay of the scheduled hearing. It is also observed that this affidavit contains language nearly identical to that found in a number of previous affidavits from Allen County. Affidavits filed to obtain a delay are an abuse of the purpose for which R.C.2701.03is intended, are a waste of judicial resources, and, if repeated, could result in appropriate sanctions being imposed against an offending person.
The affidavit filed herein is found not well-taken and is hereby dismissed.