Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Off. of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264 (Ohio 1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Date
1988-03-16
Topic
general

Per Curiam. This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. *266 Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.