Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Rogalin v. N.Y. City Teachers' Retirement Bd

290 N.Y. 664

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1943-03-11
Topic
general

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., Finch and Lewis, JJ., dissent on the ground that the filing of charges and suspension from a position in the public service terminates such service conditionally or at least interrupts it and retirement must await restoration to the public service. (Matter of Eberle v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of Rogalin v. N.Y. City Teachers' Retirement Bd. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., Finch and Lewis, JJ., dissent on the ground that the filing of charges and suspension from a position in the public service terminates such service conditionally or at least interrupts it and retirement must await restoration to the public service. (Matter of Eberle v. La Guardia, 285 N. Y. 247.)