Opinion · Nylaw New York

BIRDSALL v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., 65 N.Y.2d 913 (1985)

MARIE R. BIRDSALL, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & Co., INC., et al.,Respondents., 483 N.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1985)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1985-07-11
Topic: general

BIRDSALL v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., 65 N.Y.2d 913 (1985) 483 N.E.2d 131, 493 N.Y.S.2d 456 MARIE R. BIRDSALL, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., et al.,Respondents.Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided July 11, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Guy A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BIRDSALL v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., 65 N.Y.2d 913 (1985). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BIRDSALL v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC.,65 N.Y.2d 913(1985)

483 N.E.2d 131,493 N.Y.S.2d 456

MARIE R. BIRDSALL, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., et al.,

Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 11, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department,Page 914Guy A. Graves, J.

Arnold M. Gordonfor appellant.Margaret Comard Lynchfor Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc., respondent.Bruce A. Bellfor Otis Elevator Company, respondent.Page 915

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (109 A.D.2d 969).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.