Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Stoganovic v. Dinolfo

61 N.Y.2d 812

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1984-02-16
Topic: general

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 729). *814Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stoganovic v. Dinolfo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 24 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 729).

*814 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.