Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.
M.I.F. Sec. Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co., 60 N.Y.2d 936 (New York Court of Appeals 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1983-11-29
- Topic
- international-arbitration
How later courts describe this case
- “A partnership may not assert the claim of an individual partner, any more than an individual partner may assert the claim of the partnership.” (citation omitted)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 211) except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.