Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney
L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney, 59 N.Y.2d 651 (New York Court of Appeals 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1983-04-28
- Topic
- international-arbitration
How later courts describe this case
- holding that where a Pennsylvania company’s only contact with New York was several telephone conversations with a New York company, such communications were not sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over the nonresident
- telephone conversations resulting in the purchase of stock by the defendant in Pennsylvania to the plaintiff brokerage firm were insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.
- defendant’s out-of-state telephone communications resulting in telephonic stock purchase order from plaintiff New York stock brokerage firm constituted insufficient contacts
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 540).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.