Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney

L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney, 59 N.Y.2d 651 (New York Court of Appeals 1983)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1983-04-28
Topic
international-arbitration

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that where a Pennsylvania company’s only contact with New York was several telephone conversations with a New York company, such communications were not sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over the nonresident
  • telephone conversations resulting in the purchase of stock by the defendant in Pennsylvania to the plaintiff brokerage firm were insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.
  • defendant’s out-of-state telephone communications resulting in telephonic stock purchase order from plaintiff New York stock brokerage firm constituted insufficient contacts

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed L. F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin v. McTamney. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
22 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 540).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.