Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF SEDA v. Richards

57 N.Y.2d 737

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1982-09-10
Topic
international-arbitration

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division. Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF SEDA v. Richards. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
MATTER OF SEDA v. RICHARDS,57 N.Y.2d 737(1982)
In the Matter of NESTOR J. SEDA, JR., Respondent, et al., Petitioners, v.
MARTIN RICHARDS et al., Respondents, and REUBEN BRADFORD, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued September 9, 1982
Decided September 10, 1982
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MAYER, J.Page 738
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 739
Alexander PotruchandJoseph F. Lisafor appellant.Andrew Schnierfor petitioner-respondent.
Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER. Taking no part: Judge GABRIELLI.