Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Hart v. Sullivan

55 N.Y.2d 1011

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1982-02-23
Topic
intellectual-property-and-technology

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]) order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 865; cf. Matter of State Univ. of N. Y. at Albany v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 81 AD2d 688, affd 55 NY2d 896). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hart v. Sullivan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
29 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]) order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 865; cf. Matter of State Univ. of N. Y. at Albany v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 81 AD2d 688, affd 55 NY2d 896).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.