Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Fullilove v. Carey

Fullilove v. Carey, 48 N.Y.2d 826 (New York Court of Appeals 1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1979-11-20
Topic
estate-planning

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 798; see, also, Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer dissent *828and vote to reverse (see dissenting opn by Fuchsberg, J., in Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fullilove v. Carey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 798; see, also, Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer dissent *828 and vote to reverse (see dissenting opn by Fuchsberg, J., in Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith).