Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Siciliano

People v. Siciliano, 40 N.Y.2d 996 (New York Court of Appeals 1976)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1976-12-16
Topic: international-arbitration

Order affirmed. On the issues raised both with respect to the waiver of defects with respect to the pleas of guilty and those raised under the Federal Constitution, the State Constitution and the statutes, the court is not persuaded by any of defendants’ contentions. Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Siciliano. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

PEOPLE v. SICILIANO,40 N.Y.2d 996(1976)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL SICILIANO, VICTOR

ECHAVARRY, JR., and DANIEL GIBSON, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 18, 1976

Decided December 16, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM J. DROHAN, J.Page 997

Charles G. MoerdlerandMorris Weissbergfor appellants.Mario Merola, District Attorney (Stephen R. Bookinof counsel), for respondents.Louis J. Lefkowitz (Jules E. OrensteinandPhilip Weinbergof counsel), in his statutory capacity under section71of the Executive Law.

Order affirmed. On the issues raised both with respect to the waiver of defects with respect to the pleas of guilty and those raised under the Federal Constitution, the State Constitution and the statutes, the court is not persuaded by any of defendants' contentions.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.