Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Haar v. Armendaris Corp.

31 N.Y.2d 1040

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1973-02-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • Agent’s New York acts are not basis for jurisdiction over foreign defendant-client
  • adopting Appellate Division dissenting opinion

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Haar v. Armendaris Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
53 opinions

Order reversed on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs in all courts, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gtabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.