Opinion · Nylaw New York

PEOPLE v. TOMASINO, 283 N.Y. 660 (1940)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y., Respondent, v. JOSEPH TOMASINO,Appellant., 28 N.E.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1940)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1940-06-11
Topic: general

PEOPLE v. TOMASINO, 283 N.Y. 660 (1940) 28 N.E.2d 396 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH TOMASINO,Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 25, 1940 Decided June 11, 1940 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DONNELLAN, J. Philip Segal and Samuel Segal for appellant. Thomas E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. TOMASINO, 283 N.Y. 660 (1940). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLEv.TOMASINO,283 N.Y. 660(1940)

28 N.E.2d 396

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,v.JOSEPH TOMASINO,

Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 25, 1940

Decided June 11, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DONNELLAN, J.

Philip SegalandSamuel Segalfor appellant.Thomas E. Dewey, District Attorney(Charles W. ManningandStanley H. Fuldof counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.