Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck
27 N.Y.2d 687
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1970-07-01
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Memorandum. Since the allegations of the complaint do not assert a fraud “aimed at the public generally” (Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 405; see also, James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260), plaintiffs are not entitled to exemplary damages. The record contains all of the proof required to make a final disposition of this case.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 19 opinions
Memorandum. Since the allegations of the complaint do not assert a fraud “aimed at the public generally” (Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 405; see also, James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260), plaintiffs are not entitled to exemplary damages. The record contains all of the proof required to make a final disposition of this case. Based on the plaintiffs’ uncontradicted evidence, the net amount of compensatory damages is $74,942.67. In addition, the faithless trustee should be surcharged in the amount of $9,316, the salary paid him in the course of his stewardship. Plaintiffs are also entitled to interest from January 1,1955, as directed by the trial court.
Accordingly, the order should be modified by striking the award of exemplary damages and reducing the net amount of compensatory damages to $84,258.67.
Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Gibson concur; Judge Breitel dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum, in which Judge Jasen concurs: Insufficient basis was shown to establish error and for that reason I would affirm generally. I would note agreement, however, with the majority that punitive damages were not allowable. But in
Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.