Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People v. Fazio
People v. Fazio, 14 N.Y.2d 716 (New York Court of Appeals 1964)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1964-04-30
- Topic
- general
Order affirmed upon the ground that, unlike People v. Mangi (10 N Y 2d 86), it was not the District Attorney who prevented the accomplice witness from fully explaining his motive for offering testimony that implicated defendant in the crime for which he was convicted. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Fazio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Order affirmed upon the ground that, unlike People v. Mangi (10 N Y 2d 86), it was not the District Attorney who prevented the accomplice witness from fully explaining his motive for offering testimony that implicated defendant in the crime for which he was convicted.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.