Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MAINER v. THE STATE OF OHIO, 172 Ohio St. 385 (1961)

176 N.E.2d 220

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1961-06-07
Topic
general

MAINER v. THE STATE OF OHIO, 172 Ohio St. 385 (1961) 176 N.E.2d 220 MAINER, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE.DRAGO, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE. Nos. 37048 and 37049Supreme Court of Ohio.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MAINER v. THE STATE OF OHIO, 172 Ohio St. 385 (1961). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MAINER v. THE STATE OF OHIO,172 Ohio St. 385(1961)
176 N.E.2d 220
MAINER, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE.
DRAGO, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE.
Nos. 37048 and 37049
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 7, 1961.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional questioninvolved — Habeas corpus — Extradition — Evidence.
APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County.
Mr. Vincent P. Sherman, for appellants.Mr. Thomas A. Beil, prosecuting attorney, andMr. Loren E. VanBrocklin, for appellee.
The appeals as of right herein are dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved. See paragraph one of the syllabus ofIn re Harris,170 Ohio St. 151.Appeals dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, RADCLIFF and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.