Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

THRASH v. ALVIS, WARDEN, 170 Ohio St. 184 (1959)

THRASH, APPELLANT v. ALVIS, WARDEN, APPELLEE., 163 N.E.2d 167 (Ohio 1959)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1959-12-09
Topic
general

THRASH v. ALVIS, WARDEN, 170 Ohio St. 184 (1959) 163 N.E.2d 167 THRASH, APPELLANT v. ALVIS, WARDEN, APPELLEE. No. 36211Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 9, 1959.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed THRASH v. ALVIS, WARDEN, 170 Ohio St. 184 (1959). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

THRASH v. ALVIS, WARDEN,170 Ohio St. 184(1959)
163 N.E.2d 167
THRASH, APPELLANT v. ALVIS, WARDEN, APPELLEE.
No. 36211
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided December 9, 1959.
Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatableconstitutional question involved — Criminal law — Possession ofnarcotics — Evidence — Search and seizure — Section 14, ArticleI, Constitution — Indictment — Sufficiency — Sentence — Dueprocess — Habeas corpus.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
Mr. Edward M. Thrash, in propria persona.Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, andMr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for appellee.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed,sua sponte, for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.Page 185