Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.
In Re Arb. Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental S.S. Corp., 6 N.Y.2d 773 (New York Court of Appeals 1959)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1959-04-17
- Topic
- international-arbitration
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467).