Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

THE STATE OF OHIO v. JEWETT, 165 Ohio St. 292 (1956)

STATE OF Ohio, APPELLEE v. JEWETT, APPELLANT., 135 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio 1956)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1956-05-16
Topic
general

THE STATE OF OHIO v. JEWETT, 165 Ohio St. 292 (1956) 135 N.E.2d 63 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. JEWETT, APPELLANT. No. 34773Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided May 16, 1956.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed THE STATE OF OHIO v. JEWETT, 165 Ohio St. 292 (1956). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

THE STATE OF OHIO v. JEWETT,165 Ohio St. 292(1956)
135 N.E.2d 63
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. JEWETT, APPELLANT.
No. 34773
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided May 16, 1956.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional questioninvolved — Criminal law — Sodomy — Evidence — Section 10,Article I, Constitution — Due process of law.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Trumbull County.
Mr. Charles H. Anderson, prosecuting attorney, andMr. Paul B.Moritz, for appellee.Mr. Francis X. Diana, for appellant.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.Page 293