Opinion · Illaw Illinois

STANTON v. SHAKOFSKY, 2 Ill. App.2d 527 (1954)

Vernard Stanton, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore Shakofsky,Defendant-Appellant., 119 N.E.2d 812 (Ill. App. Ct. 1954)

STANTON v. SHAKOFSKY, 2 Ill. App.2d 527 (1954) 119 N.E.2d 812 Vernard Stanton, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore Shakofsky,Defendant-Appellant. Gen.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STANTON v. SHAKOFSKY, 2 Ill. App.2d 527 (1954). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STANTON v. SHAKOFSKY,2 Ill. App.2d 527(1954)

119 N.E.2d 812

Vernard Stanton, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore Shakofsky,

Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 9,937. (Abstract of Decision.)

Appellate Court of Illinois.

Opinion filed May 21, 1954.

Released for publication June 7, 1954.

Page 528

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macoupin county; the Hon. L.E. WILHITE, Judge, presiding. Reversed. Heard in this court at the May term, 1954.

Emerson Baetz, for appellant;

Hemphill Kelsey, and John W. Russell, for appellee.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE REYNOLDS.

Not to be publishedin full.Opinion filed May 21, 1954; released for publication June 7, 1954.