Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

DELONG v. CAMPBELL, 156 Ohio St. 190 (1951)

DELONG, APPELLANT v. CAMPBELL, APPELLEE.[fn*], 101 N.E.2d 501 (Ohio 1951)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1951-10-03
Topic
general

DELONG v. CAMPBELL, 156 Ohio St. 190 (1951) 101 N.E.2d 501 DELONG, APPELLANT v. CAMPBELL, APPELLEE.[fn*] No. 32661Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided October 3, 1951. [fn*] Reporter's Note: Motion to certify the record allowed. Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Physician and patient — Malpractice — Failure to remove surgical sponge — Negligence — Limitation of actions — Cause of action accrues, when — Due process — Section 16, Article 1, Constitution.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DELONG v. CAMPBELL, 156 Ohio St. 190 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DELONG v. CAMPBELL,156 Ohio St. 190(1951)
101 N.E.2d 501
DELONG, APPELLANT v. CAMPBELL, APPELLEE.fn*
No. 32661
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 3, 1951.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional questioninvolved — Physician and patient — Malpractice — Failure toremove surgical sponge — Negligence — Limitation of actions —Cause of action accrues, when — Due process — Section 16,Article 1, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Licking county.
Mr. Albert E. Savoy, for appellant.Messrs. Kreider Kreider, Messrs. Porter, Stanley, TreffingerPlatt, andMr. Bruce G. Lynn, for appellee.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, and HART, JJ., concur.Page 191
  1. Reporter's Note: Motion to certify the record allowed. ↩