Opinion · Nylaw New York

LOESER v. LIEBMANN, 137 N.Y. 555 (____)

FREDERICK LOESER, Appellant, v. HERMAN LIEBMANN et al., Respondents., 33 N.E. 150 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 2026)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 2026-07-14
Topic: general

LOESER v. LIEBMANN, 137 N.Y. 555 (____) 33 N.E. 150 FREDERICK LOESER, Appellant, v. HERMAN LIEBMANN et al., Respondents.Court of Appeals of the State of New York. THIS case was argued and decided with and involved the same facts as Loeser v. Liebmann (ante, page 163).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOESER v. LIEBMANN, 137 N.Y. 555 (____). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LOESERv. LIEBMANN,137 N.Y. 555(____)

33 N.E. 150

FREDERICK LOESER, Appellant,v. HERMAN LIEBMANN et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

THIS case was argued and decided with and involved the same facts asLoeserv.Liebmann(ante,page 163).

The following is themem. of decision:

"We think no case for an injunction was made out, assuming the construction of the lease claimed by the plaintiff to be the true one.

"The judgment should be modified as in the case No. 1, between the same parties, and, as modified, it should be affirmed, with costs to defendant."

All concur.

Judgment accordingly.