Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Company
Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Co., 263 N.Y. 671 (New York Court of Appeals 1934)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1934-01-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “[A]ny inconsistency between the bond and the indenture must be construed in favor of the bondholder.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Lehman, J.